Case Study: Remedial Oversight of a Mismanaged Residential Construction Project

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

Project Overview

​

A residential construction project in North Dublin was initiated by homeowners who directly hired a contractor without engaging a professional team at the project's outset. Unfortunately, this led to gross overpayment for subpar and incomplete work. The project faced significant delays, increased costs, and a stressful process for the homeowners. As a quantity surveyor, I was engaged to assess the situation, mitigate losses, and manage the project to completion.

​

Key Challenges

​

1. Overpayment for Incomplete Work
   The contractor had been paid disproportionately for the work completed, leaving a substantial gap between payments and actual value delivered.

2. Lack of Initial Oversight
   No architect or quantity surveyor had been involved in the project from the beginning, leading to poor documentation, unclear scope, and unsatisfactory progress.

3. Contractor's Lack of Capacity
   Upon investigation, it became evident that the contractor lacked the resources and expertise to complete the project.

4. Re-Evaluation and Retendering
   The project required a comprehensive reassessment of work done and the preparation of new tender documents to bring the project back on track.

5. Cost Overruns
   Due to poor (none) management and initial missteps, the project incurred additional costs.
    

Action Plan and Execution
 

1. Assessment of the Work Done

• Conducted a thorough site inspection to quantify and document the actual work completed by the contractor.

• Collaborated with a structural engineer to verify the quality and integrity of the work done.

• Compiled a comprehensive report outlining:

  • Completed works.

  • Outstanding tasks.

  • Costs associated with the completed and pending work.

2. Financial Reconciliation

• Calculated the value of the completed work versus the payments made.

• Presented this evaluation to the homeowners, highlighting the financial discrepancies.

3. Engagement with the Contractor

• Met with the contractor to review the discrepancies and payment schedule.

• Determined that the contractor had no capacity to complete the project.

• Officially terminated the contractor's involvement, ensuring all legal and contractual obligations were adhered to.

4. Retendering and Contractor Selection

• Redrafted the tender documents to reflect the remaining work.

• Invited new contractors to bid on the project and conducted a stringent selection process based on:

  • Financial stability.

  • Relevant experience.

  • Capacity to complete the project within a realistic timeline.

5. Project Management to Completion

• Managed the construction phase, including:

  • Overseeing progress to ensure quality and adherence to specifications.

  • Regular inspections and reporting.

  • Clear payment schedules tied to milestones.

• Ensured proper snagging and final adjustments, including painting and final finishes.

6. Final Account Agreement

• Verified all work completed by the new contractor.

• Compiled the final account and ensured the project closed with all parties in agreement.

Lessons Learned

1. Importance of a Professional Team
   Engaging a qualified architect, quantity surveyor, and project manager at the outset prevents mismanagement and overpayment.

2. Contractor Selection
   A rigorous contractor selection process is essential, including financial checks, references, and capacity assessment.

3. Payment Oversight
   Payments must be tied to verifiable milestones rather than ad-hoc or "pay-as-you-go" approaches.

4. Regulatory Gaps in Ireland
   Unlike regions such as California, Ireland lacks a robust system for contractor licensing, bonding, and insurance. This project highlights the need for homeowners to independently verify contractor credentials and financial stability.

5. Value of Engineering Input
   The involvement of a competent engineer mitigated some losses by verifying the soundness of the initial work.

Outcome

While the project ultimately exceeded the initial budget and timeline, it was successfully completed with improved oversight and quality control. This case underscores the critical importance of proper planning, professional involvement, and a structured approach to construction projects.

The experience serves as a valuable lesson for homeowners, contractors, and policymakers alike, emphasizing the need for professionalism and accountability at every stage of construction.